Changes between Version 15 and Version 16 of ApertureDiscussion

Timestamp:

10/10/06 17:36:22 (18 years ago)

Author:

sauermann

Comment:

--

ApertureDiscussion

@@ -23 +23 @@
 pros:
 
-* bindings for various RDF stores that we get for free
+ * bindings for various RDF stores that we get for free
 
 cons:
 
-* is RDF2GO still using java.net.URIs? That would mean a lot of 
+ * is RDF2GO still using java.net.URIs? That would mean a lot of 
 conversions that are potentially not necessary, e.g. when using a Sesame 
 Repository: org.openrdf.model.URIs get translated to java.net.URIs and 
 back to org.openrdf.model.URIs.
 
-* RDFContainer lacks full RDF graph access. A simple getStatements 
+ * RDFContainer lacks full RDF graph access. A simple getStatements 
 method with a subject parameter would solve this though. I've also read 
 comments by Gunnar about having to cast RDFContainer to 
@@ -38 +38 @@
 
 Gunnar and Leo are happy with this:
-* We keep RDFContainer as it is and only switch "getModel()" to return a RDF2GO model.
-* We switch the methods of RDFContainer to use RDF2GO interfaces (RDF2Go's predicate, resource, etc) for the setProperty(property, value) methods.
+ * We keep RDFContainer as it is and only switch "getModel()" to return a RDF2GO model.
+ * We switch the methods of RDFContainer to use RDF2GO interfaces (RDF2Go's predicate, resource, etc) for the setProperty(property, value) methods.
 
 == java.io.File-Based Exctractors ==