Changes between Version 19 and Version 20 of ApertureDiscussion


Ignore:
Timestamp:
11/02/06 17:27:01 (18 years ago)
Author:
mylka
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ApertureDiscussion

    v19 v20  
    33 
    44most of these features would be fine if fixed before ISWC2006, 5th November 2006. 
     5 
     6== CrawlerHandler vs. RDFContainerFactory == 
     7 
     8These interfaces shouldn't be mixed together. I would suggest the removal of the getRDFContainerFactory method from the CrawlerHandler interface. The RDFContainerFactory should be set 
     9on the crawler before the beginning of the crawling process, not called from the CrawlerHandler. Also, all examples should be rewritten in a way that they use a simple RDFContainerfactory 
     10that creates a new RDFContainer backed by a fresh and empty Repository/Model on every invocation of the getRDFContainer method. As such the data should be explicitly transferred from 
     11this temporary container to the backing model/repository. This would be more elegant and more instructive as far as the intended usage is concerned. The user could 'see' the flow of  
     12data in the source code. If have a Repository in the CrawlerHandler and generate RDFContainers backed by this repository, it might be non-obvious where does the data in the repository 
     13actually comes from. 
    514 
    615== RDFContainer based on RDF2GO ==