Changes between Version 11 and Version 12 of ApertureLicense

Timestamp:

10/10/05 21:28:35 (19 years ago)

Author:

anonymous

Comment:

--

ApertureLicense

@@ -5 +5 @@
 The core parts (APIs and closely associated classes) are free to use and to extend. They should be as open as possible so that anyone can include Aperture in a project, commercial, closed source or not. Especially, people should not be required (or even think they are required) to disclose their own implementations for accessing proprietary document formats, data sources, etc.
 
-Besides a framework, Aperture contains a number of concrete adapter and extractor implementations. A lot of time and effort has been put in their creation and maintenance and they are therefore licensed under a '''reciprocal''' license, meaning that changes to this code, such as functional extentions, bugfixes, performance improvements, that are redistributed in one way or another way, have to be made available to the community under the same open source license.
+Besides a framework, Aperture contains a number of concrete adapter and extractor implementations. A lot of time and effort has been put in their creation and maintenance and they are therefore licensed under a reciprocal license, meaning that changes to this code, such as functional extentions, bugfixes, performance improvements, that are redistributed in one way or another way, have to be made available to the community under the same open source license.
 
 == Aduna Perspective ==