Changes between Version 33 and Version 34 of ApertureLicense
- Timestamp:
- 10/20/05 11:26:59 (19 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
ApertureLicense
v33 v34 53 53 We would be one of the front runners, adopting these relatively new OSS licenses - OSL and AFL. maybe some people may find that discouraging. We don't need annoying "I am richard stallmann and am politically correct and won't use your bad code" discussions, It really can be frustrating. Using BSD would be ok for the core to avoid that - and when the AFL and OFL are common practice, we can re-lizence. 54 54 55 Herko> Note that while AFL and OSL are not yet as big as some other licenses, we are not alone in choosing it. The Open Source Intitiative itself licenses all its content under both licenses and the licenses are used for over 100 projects on Freshmeat, including Fedora, ImageMagick and RubyOnRails. 55 Herko> Note that while AFL and OSL are not yet as big as some other licenses, we are not alone in choosing it. The Open Source Intitiative itself licenses all its content under both licenses and the licenses are used for over 100 projects on Freshmeat, including ~~Fedora~~, ImageMagick and RubyOnRails. 56 57 '''LEO> Fedora is GPL.''' http://fedora.redhat.com/licenses/eula.html 56 58 57 59 If you have the copyright, you can always relicense your own files. if all copyright owners (i.e. DFKI and Aduna, for the time being) do that jointly, you basically have relicensed the entire project.
