Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of ApertureLicense


Ignore:
Timestamp:
10/10/05 20:45:14 (19 years ago)
Author:
anonymous
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ApertureLicense

    v6 v7  
    2727'''Local jurisdiction''' - we prefer a local court (i.e. Dutch or German, depending on who is involved) rather than one in California (MPL) or New York (CPL). 
    2828 
    29 So far, all these demands are (not coincidentally) met by the [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/osl-2.1.php OSL]. 
     29So far, all these demands are (not coincidentally) met by the [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/osl-2.1.php OSL]. Still, we fear that people may think that, due to how the OSL is formulated, people may still be tempted to think that their own implementations of core APIs such as DataSource and Extractor should always be made available to the community. We believe this is not the same under the OSL (this type of extension does not qualify as a derivative work under copyright law). However, to prevent all confusion and discussion in the first place, we propose to publish all core APIs and possibly some classes that cannot be separated from it under the [http://www.opensource.org/licenses/afl-2.1.php ASL] and all concrete implementations under the OSL. 
    3030 
    3131== To Discuss ==