Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of ApertureOSGi


Ignore:
Timestamp:
10/26/05 13:30:53 (19 years ago)
Author:
anonymous
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • ApertureOSGi

    v6 v7  
    2121 * for each ApertureExtractor (or several for convenience, like "extractor pack") one bundle 
    2222 
    23 Chris> I think the DataSource API, a DataSource implementation, the DataCrawler API and the DataCrawler implementation should all be separate bundles. This is the only way to ensure that you can use different crawlers for the same DataSource. 
     23Chris> I think the !DataSource API, a !DataSource implementation, the !DataCrawler API and the !DataCrawler implementation should all be separate bundles. This is the only way to ensure that you can use different crawlers for the same !DataSource. 
    2424 
    2525Currenly, Aduna and DFKI think that we should base our code only on pure OSGi code (i.e. org.osgi.*) and not use any other utilities such as the !DependencyManager that's currently used in the Aduna code. Perhaps Herko can tell us more about what we're in for, because we both have hardly any experience with OSGi yet.