Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of ApertureRdfContainerProblems


Ignore:
Timestamp:
02/09/06 11:27:03 (18 years ago)
Author:
sauermann
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • ApertureRdfContainerProblems

    v2 v3  
    6060Here we need an ID for the node representing bob. Currently each crawler makes up this node id, but this is tricky, because blanknode IDs must conform to XML names, which are not trivial to define... (the specs are pretty much unreadable).  
    6161To get around this Chris and Gunnar have discussing adding a createBNode() method to the RDFContainer, which returns a bnode guaranteed unique within this store/repository/whatever. Good plan? 
     62 
     63LeoSauermann: For exactly the same problem we have had in gnowsis, we decided to switch to '''no blank nodes''' anymore. It is better for everyone to have some kind of uri there. So we thought of just taking the e-mail address of the recipient as mailto:uri. The advantage of that is that during smushing, there are much less triples and that the different names of a person get aggregated automatically. (which is ok for me) 
     64If the ambiguity is an issue, it might be good to say that each blank node gets a constructed URI like e-mail-uri+':to:+e-mail-address-of-recipient